July 5, 2022

Viscosi Media


Don’t | Pro-Life Representative may be the reason why thousands of students cannot afford the pit

4 min read

Then one Preliminary draft Row v. Wade leaked majority vote leaked, millions of Americans Experienced stages of grief and fear. While the effects of Rowe v. Wade are frightening, the activities of the anti-abortion movement are not limited to controlling people’s bodies. Anti-abortion sentiment has become an active way to disenfranchise communities at low cost. This political method has even reached the University of Pittsburgh. PA State House delegates have the potential for life-affirming emotions End inter-state tuition concessions For the thousands of students at Pitt.

Proponents of the voucher program have been scrutinizing Pittsburgh University funding for years, but concerns are growing. Pittsburgh has a multi-million dollar appropriation from the state Under attack From House Republicans. One of these Main components Running GOP hostility is a concern used by pit researchers Fetal tissue For scientific research. This discourse has the potential to end the tuition break for students in the state, excluding many students from pursuing secondary education.

The attack on Wade against Rowe was at the forefront of the GOP’s party ticket to the university Comment Local and countrywide from Republican delegates. Many Anti-abortion activists Accused Pitt Participate in illegal activities related to the use of fetal tissues in medical research.

The use of fetal tissues in medical research dates back to the 1930s. Fetal tissues are essential for medical research as they are so far There are no alternatives that provide the same accuracy in research. By law, all fetal tissues are donated Optional Informed consent is required for fetal tissues Compiled and provided to researchers. Pitt is not the only school that uses fetal tissues – many in the country Leading medical universities Use fetal tissues for research. Despite this fact, the university received strong response from GOP representatives and pro-life lawyers.

In 2021, Republican state representative Kathy Rap Requested Auditorial General Review of State and Federal Funding of the University. This request was a way for delegates to observe Pitt through a series of research methods Public hearing Features of University staff members and professors.

“If these allegations are true that scientists at the University of Pittsburgh were still beating their hearts out while removing the kidneys of unborn babies, they should not only immediately suspend their taxpayer funds, but everyone involved should face criminal charges,” he said. Tweeted Sean Parnell, Second Pennsylvanian Republican Representative.

Despite these claims, a External investigation Found to be a school “Full compliance with federal and state regulatory requirements” regarding the use of fetal tissues.

“As we have said in the past, fetal tissue research plays a key role in advancing life-saving research. We are committed to maintaining strong internal controls and expanding our compliance record at the state and federal levels, and we take these responsibilities seriously, “said a Pitt spokesman. University Times.

Despite these statements, the right-wing media settled on the university. David DaleidonThe anti-abortion journalist compared funding for the National Institutes of Health’s Pitt program to “part of the American horror story.” Covered by Fox News 2020 study Where Scientists modified the immune system of rats, including fetal tissues and stem cells, to further study skin infections in humans. Right-thinking media outlet Is described As they “Experiment with grafting fetal scalp with ‘full-thickness human skin’ on rats.” There was even one Blog post Claiming so Pitt had arranged an “illegal Quid-Pro-Quo” with the Western Pennsylvania Clinic’s planned guardianship to obtain samples.

These allegations may sound ridiculous, but they have real-world implications for all of Pitt’s students. On June 30, Pennsylvania MPs will finalize their support for the 2022-23 budget and finally state funding for the University of Pittsburgh. Republican lawmakers are adamant that the state should not fund Pitt because of fetal tissue research.

By June 3, Republican Congressmen once again Audit requested In Pitt’s fetal tissue research. At this point, the delegates point to their attack on UPMC’s role in Pitt’s research, as they believe that the earlier assessments that “stopped short” could potentially affect the delegates’ support for Pitt’s Appropriation Bill.

If Pitt’s general appropriation bill is not passed, many students will no longer be able to pursue university education. In Fiscal year 2020-21, Pitt offers सि 284 million tuition discount to Pennsylvanian students. About 60 per cent of that concession came from state appropriations.

“This funding supports significant tuition benefits for Pennsylvanians that could save each Pitt student about $ 60,000 in their undergraduate careers,” said David Brown, Pitt’s new vice chancellor for government relations and advocacy. University Times. “Unfortunately, this year, more than ever, Pennsylvania students and families are in real danger of losing their tuition benefits.”

This tuition discount is a life-changing benefit for many Pennsylvanian families and students. In most cases, this is the only factor that makes Pitt affordable. The fact that the bill has been threatened by anti-abortion sentiment among state representatives is an indication of how backward the life-long movement is.

Immediately after the leaked draft vote in the Jackson Women’s Health Association case against Dobbs Outrage That would be the decision to overturn Wade against Rowe Affects poor women The most. As the debate over Pitt’s funding grows, we see how the anti-abortion movement not only deprives low-income women of their bodies, but also deprives all low-income Americans of their rights. By slashing Pitt’s funding under the guise of pro-life arguments, state representatives excluded thousands of students from low-income backgrounds from higher education and ensured that the college would no longer serve as a great equalizer.

Pitt’s funding issue points to a disconnect between life-embracing rhetoric between anti-abortion and the cold indifference of thousands of students to the future. What we are facing is a group of conservative representatives who are willing to cut university funds in the name of protecting the unborn, even if it means living, breathing, changing the lives of students who depend on that money for their future.

Ebony Rice-Nguyen writes mainly on political, social and cultural issues. Write to her here [email protected].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.